Gtx 670 Vs 1660 Ti
1660 Ti Mobile vs 670
Price now 682$
Games supported 96%
Price now 88$
Games supported eighty%
Full general info
Comparison of graphics menu architecture, market place segment, value for money and other general parameters.
Place in performance rating | 134 | 266 |
Value for money | 24.05 | 18.53 |
Architecture | Turing (2018−2021) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
GPU lawmaking name | N18E-G0 | GK104 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 Apr 2019 (3 years ago) | 10 May 2012 (10 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $399 |
Price now | $682 (3x MSRP) | $88 (0.2x MSRP) |
Value for money
To get the index nosotros compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment yous accept to consider their criterion and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, peculiarly when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | no data |
CUDA cores | no data | 1344 |
Cadre clock speed | 1455 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | vi,600 one thousand thousand | three,540 1000000 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 80 Watt | no data |
Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 97 °C |
Texture make full charge per unit | 152.6 | 102.5 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | no data | 2,459.five gflops |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Data on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and GeForce GTX 670 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards information technology'south interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional ability connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connectedness slot and omnibus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of existence soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
Omnibus back up | no data | PCI Limited three.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 9.v" (24.1 cm) |
Pinnacle | no information | iv.376" (11.1 cm) |
SLI options | no data | + |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its blazon, size, motorbus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and apply a shared part of organization RAM.
Retentivity type | GDDR6 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | no information |
Retention bus width | 192 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Retentiveness bandwidth | 288.0 GB/due south | 192.two GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this department is precise simply for desktop reference ones (so-chosen Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may alter the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the bill of fare itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | Ane Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, I HDMI, One DisplayPort |
Multi monitor support | no information | 4 displays |
HDCP | no data | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | no information | 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | no data | Internal |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some item technology for your purposes.
3D Blu-Ray | no data | + |
3D Gaming | no data | + |
3D Vision | no information | + |
API back up
APIs supported, including detail versions of those APIs.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | no information |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | four.6 | iv.2 |
OpenCL | i.2 | no information |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | seven.5 | + |
Benchmark functioning
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, just if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel costless to speak up in comments section, nosotros usually gear up issues quickly.
- Passmark
- 3DMark Burn down Strike Graphics
This is probably the almost ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under diverse load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Criterion coverage: 25%
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a peppery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn down Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: xiii%
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and GeForce GTX 670. Usually measured in megahashes per 2d.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | no data | 97 Mh/s |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | no data | 13 Mh/s |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Here are the boilerplate frames per 2d in a large fix of popular games across unlike resolutions:
Full HD | 97 | no data |
1440p | 58 | no data |
4K | 35 | no data |
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 86 | no information |
Total HD
Medium Preset
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey | 80 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 66 | no information |
Battlefield 5 | 111 | no information |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 104 | no information |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 68 | no information |
Far Weep 5 | 93 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 88 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 134 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 116 | no data |
Horizon Zilch Dawn | 83 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption ii | 77 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 83 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 82 | no data |
Full Hd
Loftier Preset
Assassin'south Creed Odyssey | 69 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 49 | no information |
Battlefield 5 | 103 | no data |
Telephone call of Duty: Mod Warfare | 87 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 54 | no data |
Far Weep 5 | 89 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 85 | no information |
Forza Horizon 4 | 125 | no information |
Hitman 3 | 95 | no data |
Horizon Aught Dawn | 65 | no information |
Metro Exodus | 54 | no data |
Cherry Dead Redemption two | 41 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 73 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 103 | no data |
Picket Dogs: Legion | 71 | no data |
Total Hd
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 53 | no data |
Assassin'south Creed Valhalla | 42 | no data |
Battleground 5 | 94 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 52 | no information |
Far Weep 5 | 83 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 76 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 99 | no information |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55 | no data |
Sentinel Dogs: Legion | 33 | no data |
1440p
Loftier Preset
Call of Duty: Mod Warfare | 59 | no information |
Hitman iii | 59 | no data |
Horizon Nada Dawn | 43 | no information |
Metro Exodus | 30 | no data |
Ruddy Dead Redemption 2 | 26 | no information |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 46 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21 | no data |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 36 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 32 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 69 | no information |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 25 | no information |
Far Cry 5 | 60 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 60 | no information |
Forza Horizon iv | 30−35 | no information |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 23 | no data |
4K
High Preset
Phone call of Duty: Mod Warfare | 33 | no information |
Hitman three | 31 | no information |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 23 | no information |
Metro Exodus | 19 | no data |
Ruddy Dead Redemption ii | 17 | no information |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Chase | 35 | no data |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 22 | no information |
Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla | xiii | no data |
Battlefield five | 38 | no information |
Cyberpunk 2077 | ten | no data |
Far Cry v | 31 | no data |
Far Weep New Dawn | 32 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35 | no information |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 13 | no data |
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating | 34.12 | 17.74 |
Novelty | 23 April 2019 | 10 May 2012 |
Cost | $229 | $399 |
Memory coach width | 192 | 256 |
Memory bandwidth | 288 | 192.two |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Judging past the results of constructed and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
since information technology shows better performance.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 670 is a desktop one.
Should you still accept questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, inquire them in Comments section, and nosotros shall respond.
Cast your vote
Practice you retrieve nosotros are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Similar" button most your favorite graphics card.
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by AMD
The nearest GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6600M, which is faster by 2% and college by five positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile:
Competitors of GeForce GTX 670 past AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 670 from AMD is Radeon HD 7970, which is slower past ane% and lower by 2 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 670:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less shut to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, also as rate them yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about this comparison, concord or disagree with our judgements, or written report an error or mismatch.
Graphics settings
Screen resolution
FPS
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1660-Ti-mobile-vs-GeForce-GTX-670
0 Response to "Gtx 670 Vs 1660 Ti"
Post a Comment