Gtx 670 Vs 1660 Ti
Price now 682$ Games supported 96% Price now 88$ Games supported eighty% Comparison of graphics menu architecture, market place segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for money To get the index nosotros compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment yous accept to consider their criterion and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, peculiarly when overclocked. Data on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and GeForce GTX 670 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards information technology'south interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional ability connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connectedness slot and omnibus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of existence soldered to the notebook motherboard. Parameters of memory installed: its blazon, size, motorbus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and apply a shared part of organization RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this department is precise simply for desktop reference ones (so-chosen Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may alter the number and blazon of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the bill of fare itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some item technology for your purposes. APIs supported, including detail versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, just if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel costless to speak up in comments section, nosotros usually gear up issues quickly. This is probably the almost ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under diverse load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Criterion coverage: 25% Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a peppery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn down Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: xiii% Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and GeForce GTX 670. Usually measured in megahashes per 2d. Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the boilerplate frames per 2d in a large fix of popular games across unlike resolutions: Judging past the results of constructed and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile since information technology shows better performance. Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 670 is a desktop one. Should you still accept questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, inquire them in Comments section, and nosotros shall respond. Practice you retrieve nosotros are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Similar" button most your favorite graphics card. The nearest GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6600M, which is faster by 2% and college by five positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile: We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 670 from AMD is Radeon HD 7970, which is slower past ane% and lower by 2 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 670: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less shut to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, also as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 on a scale of i to 5: Here you can ask a question about this comparison, concord or disagree with our judgements, or written report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPS1660 Ti Mobile vs 670
Full general info
Place in performance rating 134 266 Value for money 24.05 18.53 Architecture Turing (2018−2021) Kepler (2012−2018) GPU lawmaking name N18E-G0 GK104 Market segment Laptop Desktop Release date 23 Apr 2019 (3 years ago) 10 May 2012 (10 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $229 $399 Price now $682 (3x MSRP) $88 (0.2x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1536 no data CUDA cores no data 1344 Cadre clock speed 1455 MHz no data Boost clock speed 1590 MHz no data Number of transistors vi,600 one thousand thousand three,540 1000000 Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 80 Watt no data Maximum GPU temperature no data 97 °C Texture make full charge per unit 152.6 102.5 billion/sec Floating-point performance no data 2,459.five gflops Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Laptop size medium sized no data Omnibus back up no data PCI Limited three.0 Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length no data 9.v" (24.1 cm) Pinnacle no information iv.376" (11.1 cm) SLI options no data + Memory
Retentivity type GDDR6 no data Maximum RAM amount 6 GB no information Retention bus width 192 Bit 256-bit GDDR5 Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 6.0 GB/s Retentiveness bandwidth 288.0 GB/due south 192.two GB/s Shared memory - no data Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors No outputs Ane Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, I HDMI, One DisplayPort Multi monitor support no information 4 displays HDCP no data + Maximum VGA resolution no information 2048x1536 Audio input for HDMI no data Internal Technologies
3D Blu-Ray no data + 3D Gaming no data + 3D Vision no information + API back up
DirectX 12 (12_1) no information Shader Model 6.5 5.1 OpenGL four.6 iv.2 OpenCL i.2 no information Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.126 CUDA seven.5 + Benchmark functioning
Overall score
Mining hashrates
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) no data 97 Mh/s Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) no data 13 Mh/s Gaming performance
Full HD 97 no data 1440p 58 no data 4K 35 no data Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 86 no information Total HD
Medium Preset
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey 80 no data Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66 no information Battlefield 5 111 no information Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 104 no information Cyberpunk 2077 68 no information Far Weep 5 93 no data Far Cry New Dawn 88 no data Forza Horizon 4 134 no data Hitman 3 116 no data Horizon Zilch Dawn 83 no data Red Dead Redemption ii 77 no data Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83 no data Watch Dogs: Legion 82 no data Full Hd
Loftier Preset
Assassin'south Creed Odyssey 69 no data Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49 no information Battlefield 5 103 no data Telephone call of Duty: Mod Warfare 87 no data Cyberpunk 2077 54 no data Far Weep 5 89 no data Far Cry New Dawn 85 no information Forza Horizon 4 125 no information Hitman 3 95 no data Horizon Aught Dawn 65 no information Metro Exodus 54 no data Cherry Dead Redemption two 41 no data Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73 no data The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103 no data Picket Dogs: Legion 71 no data Total Hd
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53 no data Assassin'south Creed Valhalla 42 no data Battleground 5 94 no data Cyberpunk 2077 52 no information Far Weep 5 83 no data Far Cry New Dawn 76 no data Forza Horizon 4 99 no information The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55 no data Sentinel Dogs: Legion 33 no data 1440p
Loftier Preset
Call of Duty: Mod Warfare 59 no information Hitman iii 59 no data Horizon Nada Dawn 43 no information Metro Exodus 30 no data Ruddy Dead Redemption 2 26 no information Shadow of the Tomb Raider 46 no data The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21 no data 1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36 no data Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32 no data Battlefield 5 69 no information Cyberpunk 2077 25 no information Far Cry 5 60 no data Far Cry New Dawn 60 no information Forza Horizon iv 30−35 no information Watch Dogs: Legion 23 no data 4K
High Preset
Phone call of Duty: Mod Warfare 33 no information Hitman three 31 no information Horizon Zero Dawn 23 no information Metro Exodus 19 no data Ruddy Dead Redemption ii 17 no information Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24 no data The Witcher 3: Wild Chase 35 no data 4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22 no information Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla xiii no data Battlefield five 38 no information Cyberpunk 2077 ten no data Far Cry v 31 no data Far Weep New Dawn 32 no data Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no information Watch Dogs: Legion 13 no data Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating 34.12 17.74 Novelty 23 April 2019 10 May 2012 Cost $229 $399 Memory coach width 192 256 Memory bandwidth 288 192.two Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by AMD
Competitors of GeForce GTX 670 past AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1660-Ti-mobile-vs-GeForce-GTX-670
0 Response to "Gtx 670 Vs 1660 Ti"
Post a Comment